GuidesGuide
Starting a New Job After a Bad One: What the Research Actually Shows
If you have left a bad job, you may still flinch at a neutral message from a new manager. We could not find a study that followed people from a bad job into a new one, so this page draws on two adjacent findings. In a study of 737 call-centre customer representatives, the link between customer mistreatment and lower well-being ran through cognitive rumination: going over what happened. And in a randomised trial with 100 people writing about a workplace injustice, those who wrote about both their thoughts and their emotions for four days reported higher well-being and more personal resolution than the other groups.
On this page
What a study of 737 call-centre staff found
In a 2016 study in the Journal of Management, Baranik, Wang, Gong and Shi collected time-lagged data from 737 call-centre customer representatives. They looked at mistreatment by customers and what followed it. Cognitive rumination mediated the relationship between customer mistreatment and several outcomes: supervisor-rated job performance, sabotage directed at customers, employee well-being and emotional exhaustion. Rumination was linked to more sabotage and exhaustion, and to lower performance and well-being. Sharing negative events with others was linked both to higher well-being and to more emotional exhaustion.
What a writing trial found about workplace injustice
In a 2009 study in the Journal of Applied Psychology, Barclay and Skarlicki randomly assigned 100 participants to write on four consecutive days about a workplace injustice. They wrote about their emotions, their thoughts, both their emotions and their thoughts, or a trivial topic as a control. After the intervention, people who wrote about both their emotions and their thoughts reported higher psychological well-being, fewer intentions to retaliate and more personal resolution than people in the other conditions. They also reported less anger than people who wrote only about their emotions.
Why thoughts and feelings together
The trial did not find the same benefits for writing about feelings alone or thoughts alone. The group that combined the two, describing what happened and how it felt, did best on the outcomes measured. That is a narrower finding than "writing helps", and a more useful one.
What this does not show
Neither study followed people who left a bad job and started a new one. The call-centre study was about mistreatment by customers, not managers or colleagues, and it describes statistical pathways in observational data, not proof of cause. The writing trial measured outcomes after the four days; from its summary, we cannot say how long the benefits lasted. We read both papers through their indexed summaries, not the full texts, so we have left out details we could not see. Neither study tested speaking out loud or recording your voice.
What that means if you want to try it
If a new job keeps setting off old alarms, try putting both parts into words: what the old job taught you to expect, and how that expectation feels when it fires. The writing trial suggests the combination matters more than either on its own. Phi's 60-second voice entries are one place to say it out loud. That is a format, not a tested treatment: neither study above tested voice journaling.
Sources
Baranik, L. E., Wang, M., Gong, Y., & Shi, J. (2016). Customer mistreatment, employee health, and job performance. Journal of Management.Barclay, L. J., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2009). Healing the wounds of organizational injustice: Examining the benefits of expressive writing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 511–523.Say it out loud instead.
Sixty seconds a day, in your own voice. Phi keeps it and shows you what returns.
Get Φ Phi on the App Store